Search:

  Home  ::  Articles  :: Authors  ::  Forum  ::  Calendar  ::  Blogs  ::  Bookstore   ::  Contact Us  
 
View full articles with Premium Content Membership
Password:

Not a member? - Register Now!


Other articles by this author...
  • "And" or "But"—So What?
  • Book Review: Robert Lindsey's Jesus, Rabbi and Lord
  • Deliver Us From Evil
  • Inspiration, History and Bible Translation
  • Jesus’ Most Important Title
  • John's Targumic Allusions
  • Matthew's Aramaic Glue
  • More on the Absence of an Aramaic Bible at Qumran: A Response to Jack Poirier's "Qumran Targum of Job as a Window into Second Temple Judaism, The: A Response to Randall Buth"
  • Pursuing Righteousness
  • Sons of His Will, The
  • That Small-fry Herod Antipas, or When a Fox Is Not a Fox
  • What Is the Priest Doing? Common Sense and Culture
  • What Kind of Blessing Is That?
  • Where Is the Aramaic Bible at Qumran? Scripture Use in the Land of Israel
  • Your Money or Your Life
  • Jesus’ Most Important Title

    by Randall Buth, Member of the Jerusalem School.

    Published: 01-Jan-2004


    “Son of man” is not only one of the most important phrases in the Bible, it is one of the most misunderstood and disputed. Rooms could be filled with all the books and articles written on this subject.

    Translators are not immune to fascination with this phrase, and the meaning of “son of man” is a perennial topic of debate. We are keen to understand it because it is the phrase that Jesus used for himself more than any other. A full understanding of “son of man” reveals what Jesus knew about himself and increases our appreciation of how he communicated his message.

    Many Interpretations

    There are many interpretations of the meaning of “son of man,” and people bring to the discussion different presuppositions. If I were to ask a “common man in the church” what the Gospels mean by “son of man,” he would probably respond that it refers to the humanity of Jesus. Since “Son of God” is used throughout the New Testament and refers to Jesus’ divinity, then wouldn’t “son of man” be the opposite and refer to Jesus’ humanity? There is nothing wrong with this line of reasoning as far as logic goes, but it is based on insufficient information.

    The early Greek-speaking church interpreted this phrase from the Gospels in much the same way. Ignatius, around 108 A.D., wrote that Jesus was both the “son of man” and “son of God ” (Ignatius to the Ephesians 20:2). The Epistle of Barnabus, wr



    To view the remainder of this article, please log in at the top of this page.
    OR


    OR
    If you are not yet a Premium Content subscriber, please consider this amazing tool for Bible study. Premium Content membership gives you access to hundreds of articles, written by many of the best New Testament scholars in Israel and abroad, which illuminated Jesus' sayings. (Read our free sample articles!)
    New articles are continually being added to this database of knowledge. Articles are searchable by keyword, category or scripture reference.

    Articles published by Jerusalem Perspective Online express the views of their authors, and do not necessarily reflect the views of Jerusalem Perspective Online, David Bivin or other members of the Jerusalem School of Synoptic Research.

    Copyright 1987 - 2010  Jerusalem Perspective. All rights reserved.
    Click to find other articles with same subject categories:
  • Aramaic Language
  • Bar-Kochva Letters
  • Bible Translation
  • Church Fathers
  • Dead Sea Scrolls
  • Exposition of Scripture
  • First-century Jewish Languages
  • Greek Language
  • Hebrew Language
  • Jerusalem School
  • Jesus' Messianic Claims
  • Jesus' Theology
  • Life of Jesus
  • Messiah and Messianism
  • Mishnaic Hebrew
  • New Testament Theology
  • Robert Lindsey
  • Sayings of Jesus
  • Semitisms
  • Synoptic Problem

  • All bookstore transactions are secure through encryption and all private information is kept strictly confidential.